Problemas de "imputação subjetiva” no direito penal nacional e internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46274/1909-192XRICP2021v6n1p26-47Palavras-chave:
Imputação subjetiva, Direito Penal Internacional, Dolus, Erro de direitoResumo
Costuma-se dizer que doutrinas e conceitos nacionais não devem ser importados indiscriminadamente para o Direito Penal Internacional. Tal máxima está certamente correta, contudo, quais são exatamente as diferenças entre o Direito Penal nacional e o internacional, e.g., no âmbito da parte geral no que diz respeito aos elementos subjetivos do crime? Que particularidades existem entre a imputação da macrodelinquência em comparação com os crimes “comuns”? Este ensaio identifica três problemas clássicos relativos aos elementos subjetivos do crime em que algumas dessas particularidades existem. A investigação, no entanto, não exclui a possibilidade de que o Direito Penal Internacional possa aprender com as doutrinas do Direito Penal desenvolvidas nacionalmente.
Referências
AMBOS, Kai. International Criminal Law: The Crimes and Sentencing. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, v. II, 2014.
_____. Treatise on International Criminal Law. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, v. I, 2013.
ARENDT, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. [s.l.]: Faber and Faber, 1963. (= Eichmann em Jerusalém: um relato sobre a banalidade do mal. Trad. José Rubens Siqueira. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.). AUSTIN, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence. 4. ed. [s.l.]: John Murray, v. I, 1873.
BADAR, Mohamed Elewa. The concept of mens rea in International Criminal Law. [s.l.]: Hart Publishing, 2013.
BADAR, Mohamed Elewa; MARCHUK, Iryna. A comparative study of the principles governing criminal responsibility in the major legal systems of the world (England, United States, Germany, France, Denmark, Russia, China, and Islamic Legal Tradition). Criminal Law Forum, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-48, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10609-012-9187-z.
BASSIOUNI, Mahmoud Cherif. Commentaries on the International Law Commission’s 1991 Draft Code. [s.l.]: Erès, 1993.
BEHRENS, Paul. Genocide and the question of motives. Journal of International Criminal Justice, [s.l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 501-523, 2012. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqs038.
BERMAN, Harold J. Law and Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.
BINDING, Karl. Die Normen und ihre Übertretung. 2. ed. [s.l.]: Engelmann, v. II/2, 1916.
BOULOC, Bernard. Droit pénal général. 22. ed. Paris: Dalloz, 2011.
BÖHMER, Johann Samuel Friedrich von. Observationes selectae ad Bened. Carpzovii Practicam novam rerum criminalium Imperialem Saxonicam. Frankfurt/Oder: Franciscus Varrentrapp, 1759.
CASSESE, Antonio; GAETA, Paola. Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3. ed. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2013.
DESPORTES, Frédéric; LE GUNEHEC, Francis. Droit pénal général. 16. ed. Paris: Economica, 2009.
ENGELMANN, Woldemar. Die Schuldlehre der Postglossatoren und ihre Fortentwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1895.
_____. Irrtum und Schuld nach der italienischen Lehre und Praxis des Mittelalters: ein lehrgeschichtlicher Nachweis und Beitrag zur Klärung der strafrechtlichen Zurechnungslehre. [s.l.]: Stilke, 1922.
ENGISCH, Karl. Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit im Strafrecht.
[s.l.]: Liebmann, 1930.
FINNIN, Sarah. Mental elements under Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a comparative analysis. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, [s.l.], v. 61, n. 2, p. 325-359, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/ S0020589312000152.
FORGUSON, Lynd. Common sense. London/New York: Routledge, 1989.
GEHRIG, Klaus. Der Absichtsbegriff in den Straftatbeständen des Besonderen Teils. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1986.
GIL GIL, Alicia. Derecho Penal Internacional. Madrid: Tecnos, 1999.
GREENAWALT, Alexander K. A. Rethinking genocidal intent: the case for a knowledge-based interpretation. Columbia Law Review, [s.l.], v. 99, n. 8, p. 2259-2294, 1999. DOI: 10.2307/1123611.
HELLER, Kevin; DUBBER, Markus (Ed.). The handbook of Comparative Criminal Law. [s.l.]: Stanford University Press, 2011.
HIPPEL, Robert von. Die Grenze von Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit. Eine Dogmatische Studie. [s.l.]: Hirzel, 1903.
JAKOBS, Günther. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 2. ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1991.
JESCHECK, Hans-Heinrich. Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Allgemeiner Teil. 3. ed. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1978. (= Tratado de Derecho Penal: parte general. Trad. Francisco Muñoz Conde e Santiago Mir Puig. Barcelona: Bosch, 1981.).
_____. The general principles of International Criminal Law set out in Nuremberg, as mirrored in the ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice, [s.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 38-55, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/2.1.38.
JESSBERGER, Florian. The definition and the elements of the crime of genocide. In: GAETA, Paola. (Ed.). The UN Genocide Convention: a commentary. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 87 ss.
KELSEN, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. [s.l.]: Harvard University Press, 1945. (= Teoria geral do Direito e do Estado. 3. ed. Trad. Luis Carlos Borges. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998.).
KENNY, Anthony. Action, emotion and will. [s.l.]: Routledge and Paul, 1963.
KRESS, Claus. The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent. Journal of International Criminal Justice, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 3, p. 562–578, 2005. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqi054.
KRUGLANSKI, Arie W. The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory. Psychological Review, [s.l.], v. 82, n. 6, p. 387-406, 1975.
KUPER, Leo. The prevention of genocide. New Haven Conn: Yale University Press, 1985.
MacINTYRE, Alasdair. The antecedents of actions. In: WILLIAMS, Bernard; MONTEFIORE, Alan. (Ed.). British Analytical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Paul, 1966. p. 205-225.
MAURACH, Reinhart. Deutsches Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 4. ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1971.
MERCADAL, Barthélémy. Recherches sur l’intention en droit pénal. Revue de science criminelle, Paris, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-47, 1967.
MEZGER, Edmund. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Ein Studienbuch. 2. ed. München: Biederstein, 1948.
MUÑOZ CONDE, Francisco. Edmund Mezger: Beiträge zu einem Juristenleben. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2007.
_____. Edmund Mezger y el Derecho penal de su tempo. 2. ed. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2001.
PLAWSKI, Stanislaw. Etude des principes fondamentaux du Droit International Pènal. Paris: Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1972.
PRADEL, Jean. Droit penal comparé. 3. ed. Paris: Dalloz, 2008.
POLLOCK, Frederick; MAITLAND, Frederic William. The History of English Law before the time of Edward I. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1895, v. 2.
ROBINSON, Paul. Structure and function in Criminal Law. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 1997.
ROSSKOPF, Ulrich. Die Innere Tatseite des Völkerrechtsverbrechens: Ein Beitrag Zur Auslegung des Art. 30 Istgh-Statut. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2007.
SATZGER, Helmut. Internationales und Europäisches Strafrecht. 6. ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013.
SCHABAS, William. The International Criminal Court: a commentary on the Rome Statute. [s.l.]: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SCHULZ, Fritz. History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953. _____. Principles of Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.
SIEBER, Ulrich; CORNILS, Karin. Nationales Strafrecht in rechtsvergleichender Darstellung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, v. 3, 2008.
STEIN, Peter. Regulae Iuris: from juristic rules to legal maxims. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966.
STOOSS, Carl. Dolus eventualis und Gefährdung. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, Berlin, v. 15, p. 199-201, 1895.
_____. Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch: Vorentwurf mit Motiven im Auftrage des schweizerischen Bundesrates. Basel: Georg, 1894.
STUCKENBERG, Carl-Friedrich. Vorstudien zu Vorsatz und Irrtum im Völkerstrafrecht. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
TRIFFTERER, Otto. Article 32. In: TRIFFTERER, Otto (Ed.) Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. 2. ed. [s.l.]: C.H. Beck/ Hart/Nomos, 2008.
_____. Legal and political implications of domestic ratification and implementation processes. KRESS, Claus; LATTANZI, Flavia (Ed.). The Rome Statute and domestic legal orders. Baden-Baden: Nomos, v. I, 2000. p. 34-61.
VALLACHER, Robin R.; WEGNER, Daniel M. A theory of action identification. [s.l.]: Erlbaum, 1985.
VAN SLIEDREGT, Elies. Individual criminal responsibility in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
VEST, Hans. Genozid durch organisatorische Machtapparate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002.
_____. Humanitätsverbrechen – Herausforderung für das Individualstra-
frecht? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, Berlin, v. 113, n. 3, p. 457-498, 2001.
WEIGEND, Thomas. Intent, mistake of law and co-perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on confirmation of charges. Journal of International Criminal Justice, [s.l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 471-487, 2008. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqn034.
WELZEL, Hans. Das Deutsche Strafrecht. 11. ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1969. (= Derecho Penal alemán. Trad. Juan Bustos Ramírez e Sérgio Yáñez Pérez. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 1976.).
WERLE, Gerhard. Völkerstrafrecht. 3. ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
WILLIAMS, Glanville. Oblique Intentions. Cambridge Law Journal, [s.l.], v. 46, n. 3, p. 417-438, 1989. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197300117453.
_____. Textbook of Criminal Law. 2. ed. [s.l.]: Stevens and Sons, 1983.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Werkausgabe. 9. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, v. I, 1993. (= Investigações Filosóficas. Tradução de José Carlos Bruni. São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural, 1999.).
