O processo penal no estado penal dual
uma análise histórico-comparada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192XRICP2025v10n1p1-33Palabras clave:
análise histórico-comparada, processo penal, poder penal, estado liberal, direito penal, polícia penal, estado penal dual, direito estatal, polícia estatal, direito liberal, poder de políciaResumen
O presente artigo emprega a análise histórico-comparada para discutir o processo penal no contexto do poder penal no estado liberal moderno como direito penal e polícia penal – o estado penal dual. Com foco na Alemanha e nos Estados Unidos, ele considera duas formas de pensar o processo penal, a partir de perspectivas paralelas correspondentes a dois modos de governança do Estado: direito e polícia. A primeira é característica do estado de direito (Rechtsstaat), ao passo que a segunda pertence ao estado de polícia (Polizeistaat). A ênfase da análise está no processo penal que é consistente com a busca do ideal do direito liberal com o qual os Estados que se consideram – ou desejam ser considerados por outros – como participantes do projeto jurídico-político liberal moderno estão comprometidos.
Citas
AA.VV. Symposium, Lay participation in modern law. Comparative Legal History, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 224-324, 2016.
BECCARIA, Cesare. On crimes and punishments. [s.l.]: [s.n.], 1764. (= Dos delitos e das penas. 2. ed. Tradução: José de Faria Costa. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2007.)
COLLIN, Peter. „Wächter der Gesetze“ oder „Organ der Staatsregierung“?: Konzipierung, Einrichtung und Anleitung der Staatsanwaltschaft durch das preußische Justizministerium. Von den Anfängen bis 1860. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2000.
DUBBER, Markus D. American plea bargains, German lay judges, and the crisis of criminal procedure. Stanford Law Review, [s.l.], v. 49, n. 3, p. 547-605, 1997. DOI: 10.2307/1229343.
DUBBER, Markus D. “An Extraordinarily Beautiful Document”: Jefferson’s Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments and the Challenge of Republican Punishment. In: DUBBER, Markus D.; FARMER, Lindsay (ed.). Modern Histories of Crime and Punishment. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2007. p. 115-150. DOI: 10.1515/9780804768412-008.
DUBBER, Markus D. (ed.). Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
DUBBER, Markus D. Policing possession: the war on crime and the end of criminal law. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, [s.l.], v. 91, n. 4, p. 829-996, 2002. Disponível em: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol91/iss4/1. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2024.
DUBBER, Markus D. The Dual Penal State: The Crisis of Criminal Law in Comparative-Historical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
DUBBER, Markus D. The legality principle in American and German criminal law: an essay in comparative legal history. In: MARTYN, Georges; MUSSON, Anthony; PIHLAJAMAKI, Heikki (ed.). From the judge’s arbitrium to the legality principle: legislation as a source of law in criminal trials. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2013. p. 365-386.
DUBBER, Markus D. The Model Penal Code, legal process, and the alegitimacy of American penality. In: DUBBER, Markus D. (ed.). Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 239-261.
DUBBER, Markus D. The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
DUBBER, Markus D. The schizophrenic jury and other palladia of liberty: a critical historical analysis. Comparative Legal History, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 307-324, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/2049677X.2015.1110975.
DUBBER, Markus D. Ultima ratio as caveat dominus: legal principles, police maxims, and the critical analysis of law. [s.l.]: [s.n.], 2013. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2289479.
DUBBER, Markus D.; HÖRNLE, Tatjana. Criminal law: a comparative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
ESMEIN, Adhémar. A history of continental criminal procedure: with special reference to France. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1913.
FEUERBACH, Paul Johann Anselm. Entwurf des Gesetzbuchs über Verbrechen und Vergehen für das Königreich Bayern. [s.l.]: [s.n.], 1810.
FEUERBACH, Paul Johann Anselm. Textbook of the Common Penal Law in Force in Germany. In: DUBBER, Markus D. (ed.). Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 373-388.
FREUND, Ernst. Cases on administrative law selected from decisions of English and American courts. St. Paul: West Publishing Company, 1911.
FREUND, Ernst. The police power: public policy and constitutional rights. Chicago: Callaghan & Company, 1904.
HALLIDAY, Paul D. Habeas corpus: from England to empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.
HELLER, Kevin Jon; DUBBER, Markus D. (ed.). The handbook of comparative criminal law. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
HART JR., Henry M. The aims of the criminal law. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 23, n. 3, p. 401-441, 1958. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol23/iss3/2/. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2024.
HAY, Douglas. Property, authority and the criminal law. In: HAY, Douglas; LINEBAUGH, Peter; RULE, John G.; THOMPSON, E. P.; WINSLOW, Cal (ed.). Albion’s fatal tree: crime and society in eighteenth-century England. New York: Pantheon Books, 1975. p. 17-63.
JAKOBS, Günther. Bürgerstrafrecht und Feindstrafrecht. HRRS Strafrecht, [s.l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 88-95, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/04-03/index.php3?sz=6. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2024.
JAKOBS, Günther. Zur Theorie des Feindstrafrechts. In: ROSENAU, Henning; KIM, Sang-gyun (hrsg.). Straftheorie und Strafgerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2010. p. 167-182. (= On the Theory of Enemy Criminal Law. Tradução: Raymond Youngs e Markus Dubber. In: DUBBER, Markus D. (ed.). Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 415-424.)
JEFFERSON, Thomas. Letter to George Wythe (Nov. 1, 1778). In: FORD, Paul Leicester (ed.). The writings of Thomas Jefferson (1776-1781). New York/London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1893. p. 203-220.
KANT, Immanuel. Metaphysik der Sitten. Herausgeben von Wilhelm Wischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, v. VIII, 1977. (= Metafísica dos costumes. 3. ed. Tradução: José Lamego. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2017.)
KANT, Immanuel. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Königsberg: [s.n.], 1797.
KOCH, Arnd. Das Jahrhundert der Strafrechtskodifikation: Von Feuerbach zum Reichsstrafgesetzbuch. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, Berlin, v. 122, n. 4, p. 741-756, 2010. DOI: 10.1515/zstw.2010.741.
LANGER, Máximo. The long shadow of the adversarial and inquisitorial categories. In: DUBBER, Markus D.; HÖRNLE, Tatjana (ed.). The Oxford handbook of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2014. p. 887-912.
MALONE, Dumas. Architect of Laws: Slavery and Crime. In: MALONE, Dumas. Jefferson and his time: Jefferson the Virginian. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, v. 1, 1948. p. 261-273.
NAUCKE, Wolfgang. Kant und die psychologische Zwangstheorie Feuerbachs. Hamburg: Hansischer Gildenverl, 1962.
NELSESTUEN, Grant A. Oikonomia as a Theory of Empire in the Political Thought of Xenophon and Aristotle. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, [s.l.], v. 57, n. 1, p. 74-104, 2017. Disponível em: https://grbs.library.duke.edu/index.php/grbs/article/view/15759. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2024.
PACKER, Herbert L. The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
PACKER, Herbert L. Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, [s.l.], v. 113, n. 1, p. 1-68, 1964. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol113/iss1/1/. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2024.
RADBRUCH, Gustav. Paul Johann Anselm Feuerbach: Ein Juristenleben. Wien: Springer, 1934.
RAWLS, John. Two Concepts of Rules. The Philosophical Review, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 3-32, 1955. DOI: 10.2307/2182230.
ROSS, Jacqueline E.; THAMAN, Stephen C. (ed.). Comparative criminal procedure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub., 2016.
SCHNEEWIND, Jerome B. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
WHITMAN, James Q. Harsh justice: criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
WIGMORE, John H. Nemo tenetur seipsum prodere. Harvard Law Review, [s.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 71-88, 1891. DOI: 10.2307/1321425.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
