Espionage and the disclosure of State secrets
an analysis of article 359-K, § 4º, of Brazilian Penal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192XRICP2023v8n1p43-68Keywords:
espionage, disclosure of state secrets, whistleblower protection, justificationAbstract
The amendment by Law nº 14.197/2021, which introduced art. 359-K, § 4º, in the Brazilian Penal Code, provides a cause for exclusion of criminal liability in case of communication, delivery or publication of information and documents classified as secret, protecting whistleblowers against convictions of espionage, whenever the purpose of disclosure is to expose the practice of crime or violation of human rights. The present article intends to address, at first, whether the Brazilian legislator, contrary to the world trend in this matter, had acted well when inserting in the legal system a provision of this nature. Next, the structure chosen for the criminal protection of whistleblowers against criminal sanctions will be critically analyzed. Finally, in face of the problems raised by the wording of § 4º of art. 359-K of the Brazilian Penal Code, some considerations will be made as lege ferenda, in an attempt to overcome them.
References
ACKERMAN, John M.; SANDOVAL-BALLESTEROS, Irma E. The Global Explosion of Freedom of Information Laws. Administrative Law Review, [s.l.], v. 58, n. 1, p. 85-130, 2006.
AFTERGOOD, Steve. An Inquiry into the Dynamics of Government Secrecy. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, [s.l.], v. 48, p. 511-530, 2013.
AFTERGOOD, Steve. Reducing Government Secrecy: Finding What Works. Yale Law & Policy Review, [s.l.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 399-416, 2009.
ARNESON, Richard J. Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics, [s.l.], v. 92, n. 4, p. 616-633, 1982.
BOK, Sissela. Secrets: On the Ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.
BOOT, Eric R. The Ethics of Whistleblowing. London/New York: Routledge, 2019.
BROWNLEE, Kimberley. The civil disobedience of Edward Snowden: A reply to William Scheuerman. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 42, n. 10, p. 965-970, 2016.
CONNELLY, Matthew. State Secrecy, Archival Negligence, and the End of The History as We Know it. In: POZEN, David E. (org.). The Perilous Public Square: structural Threats to Expression Today. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.
DELMAS, Candice. The Ethics of Government Whistleblowing. Social Theory and Practice, [s.l.], v. 41, n. 1, p. 77-105, 2015.
DYCUS, Stephen; BANKS, William C.; RAVEN-HANSEN, Peter; VLADECK, Stephen I. National Security Law. 7. ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2020.
ELLSBERG, Daniel. Secrecy and National Security Whistleblowing. Social Research, [s.l.], v. 77, n. 3, p. 773-804, 2010.
EMERSON, Thomas. National Security and Civil Liberties. Yale Journal of World Public Order, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 78-112, 1982.
FENSTER, Mark. Disclosure’s Effects: Wikileaks and Transparency. Iowa Law Review, [s.l.], v. 97, n. 3, p. 713-804, 2012.
FENSTER, Mark. The Transparency Fix. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.
FISCHER, Thomas. Strafgesetzbuch. 69. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2022.
FORCESE, Craig; WEST, Leah. National Security Law. 2. ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2021.
FUCHS, Meredith. Judging Secrets: The Role Courts should play in preventing unnecessary secrecy. Administrative Law Review, [s.l.], v. 58, n.1, p. 131-176, 2006.
HALPERIN, Morton H.; BERMAN, Jerry J.; BOROSAGE, Robert L.; MARWICK, Christine M. The Lawless State: the Crimes of the U.S. Intelligence Agencies. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.
HART, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. Are there any natural rights? The Philosophical Review, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 175-191, 1955.
HARWOOD, William H. Secrecy, transparency and government whistleblowing. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 43 n. 2, p. 164-186, 2017.
HEROLD, Nico. Government-Whistleblowing-Enthüllung und Kontrolle von staatlichen Missständen. Kritische Justiz, [s.l.], v. 52, n. 3, p. 338-348, 2019.
KATZ, Alan. Government Information Leaks and the First Amendment. California Law Review, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 108-145, 1976.
KINDHÄUSER, Urs; HILGENDORF, Eric. §353b. Strafgesetzbuch. Lehr- und Praxiskommentar. 9. Auflage. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2022.
KITROSSER, Heidi. Classified Information leaks and Free of Speech. University of Illinois Law Review, [s.l.], n. 3, p. 881-931, 2008.
KÖBEL, Ralf; HEROLD, Nico. Whistleblowing und das Geheimwissen des Staates. Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, [s.l.], v. 169, n. 7, p. 377-392, 2022.
KREIMER, Seth F. Rays of Sunlight in a Shadow War: FOIA, the Abuses of Anti-Terrorism, and the Strategy of Transparency. Lewis &Clark Law Review, [s.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 1141-1220, 2007.
KREIMER, Seth F. The Freedom of Information Act and the Ecology of Transparency. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, [s.l.], v. 10, p. 1011-1080, 2008.
KRIS, David S.; WILSON, J. Douglas (org.) National Security Investigations & Prosecutions 3d. Eagn: Thomson Reuters, v. 1, 2019.
KROTOSZYNSKI, Ronald. Whistleblowing Speech and the First Amendment. Indiana Law Journal, [s.l.], v. 93, n. 2, p. 267-302, 2018.
KWOKA, Margaret B. Deferring to Secrecy. Boston College Law Review, [s.l.], v. 54, n. 1, p. 185-242, 2013.
KWOKA, Margaret B. Leaking and Legitimacy. UC Davis Law Review, [s.l.], v. 48, n. 4, p. 1387-1456, 2015.
LASSWELL, Harold. D. National Security and Individual Freedom. New York: De Capo Press, 1971.
LAUFHÜTTE, Heinrich. Staatsgeheimnis und Regierungsgeheimnis. Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, [s.l.], v. 121, p. 52-61, 1974.
LEITE, Alaor. A responsabilidade penal do whistleblower. Boletim IBCCrim, São Paulo, n. 348, p. 4-6, 2021.
MEESE, Michael J.; NIELSEN, Suzzane C.; SONDHEIMER, Rachel M. American National Security. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2019.
POZEN, David E. Freedom of Information beyond the Freedom of Information Act. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, [s.l.], v. 165, n. 5, p. 1097-1158, 2017.
POZEN, David E. Deep Secrecy. Stanford Law Review, v. 62, Issue 2, p. 257-339, 2010.
POZEN, David E. The Mosaic Theory National Security, and the Freedom of Information Act. Yale Law Journal, [s.l.], v. 115, n. 3, p. 628-679, 2005.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
RAWLS, John. Justice as fairness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
ROXIN, Claus; GRECO, Luís. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Grundlagen – Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre. 5. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck, v. I, 2020.
SAGAR, Rahul. Das mißbrauchte Staatsgeheimnis. Wikileaks und die Demokratie. In: GEISELBERGER, Heinrich (ed.) Wikileaks und die Folgen. Netz-Medien-Politik. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011. p. 201-223.
SAGAR, Rahul. Secrets and Leaks: The Dilemma of State Secrecy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
SAVAGE, Ashley. Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest: the law of unauthorized disclosures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.
SCHÄFER, Jürgen. § 353b. In: HEFENDEHL, Roland (hrsg.). Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch. 3. ed. München: C.H Beck, v. 5, 2019.
SCHAUER, Frederick. Transparency in three dimensions. University of Illinois Law Review, [s.l.], v. 4, p. 1339-1357, 2011.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
SCHEUERMAN, William. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience: The case of Edward Snowden. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 40, n. 7, p. 609-628, 2014.
SCHEUERMAN, William. What Edward Snowden can teach theorists of conscientious law breaking. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 42, n. 10, p. 958-964, 2016.
SETTY, Sudha. National Security Secrecy. Comparative Effects on Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
THOMPSON, Dennis F. Democratic Secrecy. Political Science Quarterly, [s.l.], v. 114, n. 2, p. 181-193, 1999.
WUNDERLICH, Alexandre. Crime político, segurança nacional e terrorismo. São Paulo: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
